Oh dear, oh dear
The chaps at PJH Law seem to have gotten themselves in a tizzy about me leaving them a comment offering criticism on a post.
Not only do they not seem to get how this whole conversation thing works, they responded with what amounts to "we'd like to see you do better!", and suggested they would post it on their blog. Naturally, I declined to provide them with content for free, advising them to play to their strengths. To them, the obvious response was to then have a whole post whinging about the temerity of me commenting on their blog, while also mis-spelling my name. (Incidentally, I'd like to know what they think of the publishing industry employing teams of editors. Do they think that editors are failed writers whom one should disdain for not being able to write their own books and articles?)
It would be entirely wrong to infer from this that they habitually make spelling mistakes in their professional work, as this blog post may have been hastily written in a fit of pique. Unfortunately, there is a certain halo effect, where people who are proficient or unproficient in ways known to an observer, may be assumed to have similar levels of competence in other areas. The practical application of this is that impressions matter, and they've chosen to stop posting consistently good pieces, and leave visitors with the impression that may be formed from seeing pieces that might be considered self-indulgent and curmudgeonly.
Edit: They've edited their post to correct the spelling of my name, but haven't had the courtesy to note the update.
5 comments:
I read a lot of law blogs , yours and PJH Laws included, but have never felt the need to respond until today. I think you have totally lost the point regarding the original post from PJH Law which you called 'facile'. As I see it, it is an analogy of work/leisure and how they are similar to each other in that problems need to be solved wherever you are - be it at work or at play. I actually found Liam's blog a refreshing change. He quite obviously has a life outside of work - and quite a competitive one at that. A story should have a beginning, a middle and an end - otherwise there would be no point in writing it. Liam's blog was a story and a very relevant one at that. Maybe you would like to share with us tales from your leisure time - if indeed you have one.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here, except that you liked the PJH post. I did not. Part of the richness of life is that opinions differ, and part of the richness of the blogosphere is that we can share these opinions through comments.
I have my doubts that you read this blog, as I have quiet a few posts about my leisure time, of which I do "have one."
On the contrary, I do read your blog - however I find others more interesting which is maybe why I have not discovered your 'interests'. Incidentally, regarding 'part of the richness of the blogosphere is that we can share these opinions through comments'- there are comments and 'comments'. I think your comments regarding the original PJH Law post were a tad truculent. However, each to his own.
What are 'interests'? How are they different from interests?
Also, what prompted you to register an account in the last six days?
I was prompted to join by what I have witnessed over the last week -if you care to read back to my first post you will see that I have not felt the need to respond before. I may never respond again -who knows what the future holds.......
Post a Comment